Flood Model#
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import uqtestfuns as uqtf
The flood model is an eight-dimensional scalar valued function. The model was used in the context of sensitivity analysis in [IL15, LIPG13] and has become a canonical example of the OpenTURNS package [BDIP17].
Test function instance#
To create a default instance of the flood model:
my_testfun = uqtf.Flood()
Check if it has been correctly instantiated:
print(my_testfun)
Function ID : Flood
Input Dimension : 8 (fixed)
Output Dimension : 1
Parameterized : False
Description : Flood model from Iooss and Lemaître (2015)
Applications : metamodeling, sensitivity
Description#
The flood model computes the maximum annual underflow of a river using the following analytical formula:
where \(\boldsymbol{x} = \{ q, k_s, z_v, z_m, h_d, c_b, l, b \}\) is the eight-dimensional vector of input variables further defined below. The output is given in \([\mathrm{m}]\). A negative value indicates that an overflow (flooding) occurs.
Note
Compared to the original function, this implementation inverted the sign of the output such that underflowing has a positive sign.
The model is based on a simplification of the one-dimensional hydro-dynamical equations of St. Venant under the assumption of uniform and constant flow rate and a large rectangular section.
Probabilistic input#
Based on [IL15] (Table 4), the probabilistic input model for the flood model consists of eight independent random variables with marginals shown in the table below.
Show code cell source
print(my_testfun.prob_input)
Function ID : Flood
Input ID : Iooss2015
Input Dimension : 8
Description : Probabilistic input model for the Flood model from Iooss
and Lemaître (2015)
Marginals :
No. Name Distribution Parameters Description
----- ------ -------------- ------------------------- ---------------------------------
1 Q trunc-gumbel [1013. 558. 500. 3000.] Maximum annual flow rate [m^3/s]
2 Ks trunc-normal [30. 8. 15. inf] Strickler coefficient [m^(1/3)/s]
3 Zv triangular [49. 51. 50.] River downstream level [m]
4 Zm triangular [54. 56. 55.] River upstream level [m]
5 Hd uniform [7. 9.] Dyke height [m]
6 Cb triangular [55. 56. 55.5] Bank level [m]
7 L triangular [4990. 5010. 5000.] Length of the river stretch [m]
8 B triangular [295. 305. 300.] River width [m]
Copulas : Independence
Reference results#
This section provides several reference results of typical UQ analyses involving the test function.
Sample histogram#
Shown below is the histogram of the output based on \(100'000\) random points:
Show code cell source
np.random.seed(42)
xx_test = my_testfun.prob_input.get_sample(100000)
yy_test = my_testfun(xx_test)
plt.hist(yy_test, bins="auto", color="#8da0cb");
plt.grid();
plt.ylabel("Counts [-]");
plt.xlabel("$\mathcal{M}(\mathbf{X})$");
plt.gcf().set_dpi(150);
Moments estimation#
Shown below is the convergence of a direct Monte-Carlo estimation of the output mean and variance with increasing sample sizes.
Show code cell source
# --- Compute the mean and variance estimate
np.random.seed(42)
sample_sizes = np.array([1e1, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4, 1e5, 1e6, 1e7], dtype=int)
mean_estimates = np.empty(len(sample_sizes))
var_estimates = np.empty(len(sample_sizes))
for i, sample_size in enumerate(sample_sizes):
xx_test = my_testfun.prob_input.get_sample(sample_size)
yy_test = my_testfun(xx_test)
mean_estimates[i] = np.mean(yy_test)
var_estimates[i] = np.var(yy_test)
# --- Compute the error associated with the estimates
mean_estimates_errors = np.sqrt(var_estimates) / np.sqrt(np.array(sample_sizes))
var_estimates_errors = var_estimates * np.sqrt(2 / (np.array(sample_sizes) - 1))
# --- Do the plot
fig, ax_1 = plt.subplots(figsize=(6,4))
ax_1.errorbar(
sample_sizes,
mean_estimates,
yerr=mean_estimates_errors,
marker="o",
color="#66c2a5",
label="Mean",
)
ax_1.set_xlabel("Sample size")
ax_1.set_ylabel("Output mean estimate")
ax_1.set_xscale("log");
ax_2 = ax_1.twinx()
ax_2.errorbar(
sample_sizes + 1,
var_estimates,
yerr=var_estimates_errors,
marker="o",
color="#fc8d62",
label="Variance",
)
ax_2.set_ylabel("Output variance estimate")
# Add the two plots together to have a common legend
ln_1, labels_1 = ax_1.get_legend_handles_labels()
ln_2, labels_2 = ax_2.get_legend_handles_labels()
ax_2.legend(ln_1 + ln_2, labels_1 + labels_2, loc=0)
plt.grid()
fig.set_dpi(150)
The tabulated results for each sample size is shown below.
Show code cell source
from tabulate import tabulate
# --- Compile data row-wise
outputs = []
for (
sample_size,
mean_estimate,
mean_estimate_error,
var_estimate,
var_estimate_error,
) in zip(
sample_sizes,
mean_estimates,
mean_estimates_errors,
var_estimates,
var_estimates_errors,
):
outputs += [
[
sample_size,
mean_estimate,
mean_estimate_error,
var_estimate,
var_estimate_error,
"Monte-Carlo",
],
]
header_names = [
"Sample size",
"Mean",
"Mean error",
"Variance",
"Variance error",
"Remark",
]
tabulate(
outputs,
headers=header_names,
floatfmt=(".1e", ".4e", ".4e", ".4e", ".4e", "s"),
tablefmt="html",
stralign="center",
numalign="center",
)
| Sample size | Mean | Mean error | Variance | Variance error | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0e+01 | 1.0881e+01 | 3.7105e-01 | 1.3768e+00 | 6.4901e-01 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+02 | 1.0923e+01 | 1.1809e-01 | 1.3944e+00 | 1.9819e-01 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+03 | 1.0912e+01 | 3.5515e-02 | 1.2613e+00 | 5.6436e-02 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+04 | 1.0934e+01 | 1.0940e-02 | 1.1969e+00 | 1.6927e-02 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+05 | 1.0947e+01 | 3.4272e-03 | 1.1746e+00 | 5.2529e-03 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+06 | 1.0945e+01 | 1.0828e-03 | 1.1725e+00 | 1.6581e-03 | Monte-Carlo |
| 1.0e+07 | 1.0944e+01 | 3.4271e-04 | 1.1745e+00 | 5.2527e-04 | Monte-Carlo |
References#
Bertrand Iooss and Paul Lemaître. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, pages 101–122. Springer US, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5.
Michaël Baudin, Anne Dutfoy, Bertrand Iooss, and Anne-Laure Popelin. OpenTURNS: an industrial software for uncertainty quantification in simulation. In Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, pages 2001–2038. Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_64.
M. Lamboni, B. Iooss, A.-L. Popelin, and F. Gamboa. Derivative-based global sensitivity measures: General links with Sobol' indices and numerical tests. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 87:45–54, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2013.02.002.